Buy Tobacco Leaf Online | Whole Leaf Tobacco

Fathers Day Automotive Mystery

Status
Not open for further replies.

deluxestogie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
25,605
Points
113
Location
near Blacksburg, VA
While working in my garden, beneath the sunshine of a beautiful Sunday morning, I heard a distinctive sequence of sounds that I associate with a one-car collision, originating from a quarter mile down the road. First came a deep thump, followed about 1 second later by a dull, metallic thud. Two seconds later, tires screeched on pavement. The sequence ended with a second pair of thump and thud.

I walked out to the center of the road road. A quarter mile down, a moderately old import sedan had parked itself on the side of the road, facing the wrong direction, and straddling a shallow culvert that passed beneath a gravel driveway.

I don't see all that clearly in the distance, but from the body movements and affect, I clearly discerned a male, teenage driver emerge from the car, apparently uninjured. He clapped both hands on his head, looked up at the sky, then held a small device to his ear as he walked around the car. The driver did not appear ataxic (drunk). There did not appear to be a passenger in the car. The car's grill and front bumper seemed to be undamaged.

My primary concern had been to see if someone might have been injured. So I turned back to my garden. Within three minutes of the incident, another, newer car sped down the road and stopped beside the disabled vehicle. A grown man,and a young adolescent female hopped out, and examined the disabled car, rather than speaking with the teen driver.

Analysis:
Male teen is driving the family's hand-me-down sedan along a relatively quiet country road, while fiddling with his cell phone. Being predictably inattentive, he allows his vehicle to drift to the right edge of the road, and clip the low culvert of a driveway. This launches his car a foot or two into the air. It thumps back down on the shoulder of the road. Teen driver finally reacts, by overcompensating to the left, while stomping the brakes. The car veers to the left, and clips a second driveway culvert, then thumps to rest.

His first action, after emerging from the car, is to phone his father (Happy Father's Day, by the way), who apparently lives less than a mile away. Father and teen driver's younger sister jump into their newer car, and rush to the scene to assess the damage to the car.

An Intentional

Does one call this an accident, when the driver has intentionally chosen not to attend to the tasks involved in driving a car of which he is in command? An accident?

I'm happy that nobody was injured.

Bob
 

Jitterbugdude

Moderator
Founding Member
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
4,266
Points
113
Location
Northeast Maryland
And I'll add: He probably learned nothing from the incident. Instead, he probably blamed the county for not having painted lines, or for not smoothing out the curve, or lack of signs etc.
 

FmGrowit

Head Honcho
Staff member
Joined
May 17, 2011
Messages
5,306
Points
113
Location
Freedom, Ohio, United States
They're everywhere, one of them almost hit me yesterday. He/she (couldn't see inside the tinted windows) was bouncing off the curb, then drifted into my lane.

There should be some sort of device built into cars that disables phones while the car is moving.
 

deluxestogie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
25,605
Points
113
Location
near Blacksburg, VA
There should be some sort of device built into cars that disables phones while the car is moving.
There is already. It's called "the driver."

What's really nuts is the number of middle-age and older people who surf Facebook while driving. Teenagers are inherently brain dead, but mature adults...must be Alzheimer's.

Bob
 

charlie G.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2014
Messages
577
Points
28
Location
Phila, PA
I would call it an accident from operator not being in control of their vehicle at all times.
I don't understand this need to be in touch and inform others by facebook, twitter and texting of every move they make. I know people that feel they must tell others when and where they are at, or eating, and what they are doing at all times. I guess I just don't get it. Maybe cause I'm a kind of loner. Even these people that feel the need to wear a bluetooth phone device in their ear at all times. And while I'm starting to get on a rant here. What do we need wifi or bluetooth in cars. Why instead can't there be more innovation into a more efficient engine to help cut down on gas consumption ?
 

DGBAMA

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
4,418
Points
63
Location
NORTH ALABAMA
I would call it an accident from operator not being in control of their vehicle at all times.
I don't understand this need to be in touch and inform others by facebook, twitter and texting of every move they make. I know people that feel they must tell others when and where they are at, or eating, and what they are doing at all times. I guess I just don't get it. Maybe cause I'm a kind of loner. Even these people that feel the need to wear a bluetooth phone device in their ear at all times. And while I'm starting to get on a rant here. What do we need wifi or bluetooth in cars. Why instead can't there be more innovation into a more efficient engine to help cut down on gas consumption ?

I will skip my rant, so as to not sound political (against the rules).

Short version....... We have become a society of Convenience, not Efficiency.
 

deluxestogie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
25,605
Points
113
Location
near Blacksburg, VA
I suppose that tweeting and posting selfies to Facebook grants us a (wobbly) sense of immortality, or at least quasi-celebrity. Someone was attacked by a bear, when she attempted to take a selfie that included a mother bear in the background. Another person (a Japanese tourist, I believe) was gored by a bison while attempting to do the same thing.

Perhaps posting to FTT is the same sort of thing. It documents an otherwise fleeting aspect of life. Of course, doing so also allows us to interact with others who share a passion for things tobacco, despite being scattered across the globe. But I don't think too many of us attempt to surf the forum or post to it while driving.

All in all, we become desensitized to the inherent dangers of activities in which we engage frequently.

Choosing to be careless is not accidental.

Bob
 

DIY Pete

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2013
Messages
345
Points
43
Location
Iowa
I don't get it either. I have my phone on in the car so I can hear it ring or if an e-mail dings in but I don't check it until I am no longer behind the wheel. I am not on any social media unless you count FTT and similar sites as social media.

Pete
 

ArizonaDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Messages
2,228
Points
83
Location
Phoenix, AZ (east valley)
They're everywhere, one of them almost hit me yesterday. He/she (couldn't see inside the tinted windows) was bouncing off the curb, then drifted into my lane.

There should be some sort of device built into cars that disables phones while the car is moving.

That's a great idea! You should get that patented as "intellectual property". We were rear ended at a stop light 4 years ago by a teen pizza delivery driver who was receiving a text from his boss, and didn't bother to slow down. Have been having back problems ever since. He was doing 45-50 mph. Good thing we were in our Tundra and he was in a honda civic.
 

rustycase

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
303
Points
0
Location
Left coast
So true.

I am presently engaged in a contest where multiple scientific presentations may, or may not conflict with each other.
To make matters worse, facts shall be determined by the least qualified.
Sry, it's caused me to become a bit edgy.
rc
 

deluxestogie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
25,605
Points
113
Location
near Blacksburg, VA
I was right...and wrong.

Two days ago, I walked past the scene of the single car collision from Fathers Day. Dirt gouges, rubber skid marks, dented steel culvert pipe and damaged roadside items pretty well clarified the events. I paced off some of the distances.

500' before coming to rest, the car drifted to its right, struck the leading edge of a steel culvert pipe that passed beneath a driveway entry. No indication of braking. The car continued along the right shoulder for another 100', and struck a second driveway culvert (I missed this one in the sound sequence.)

After striking the second driveway culvert, the car abruptly swerved to the left, crossed the road, and plowed a trench along the left shoulder. 300' before coming to rest, the car took out a cautionary road sign mounted on a steel post, and continued on to clip the nearest corner of a post-mounted mailbox as the car swerved right, and back onto the road.

Now, tire skid marks indicate the application of brakes--finally, after traveling 2/3 the length of a football field. After 250' more, the car came to a rest to the left of the road, just beyond a third driveway culvert.

These events played out over a span of about 0.1 mile, or the entire length of a city block. That is, TOTAL distance traveled = ~500'.

The theoretical math:

70 mph = 102.7 feet per second (fps); breaking distance = 234'; reaction time distance = 154'; TOTAL distance traveled = 388'
75 mph = 110 fps; breaking distance = 268'; reaction time distance = 165'; TOTAL distance traveled = 433'
80 mph = 117.3 fps; breaking distance = 305'; reaction time distance = 176'; TOTAL distance traveled = 481'
http://www.csgnetwork.com/stopdistinfo.html

The actual situation:
Because the car was involved in several collisions with ground objects prior to applying the brakes, the numbers get a bit murky. Just looking at the braking distance (the actual skid marks), we can assume that, at the time the brakes were finally applied--that is, after striking two culverts, swerving across the road, plowing the shoulder, and striking a road sign as well as a mailbox--the vehicle was still traveling at about 75 mph. At the moment the events started--striking the initial culvert--the car must have been moving considerably faster than 75 mph.

That's one lucky teenager.

Bob
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top